{"id":271,"date":"2000-03-01T10:58:58","date_gmt":"2000-03-01T15:58:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/?p=271"},"modified":"2008-07-01T11:00:56","modified_gmt":"2008-07-01T16:00:56","slug":"upn-flattens-a-formulaic-wb-roswell-mentioned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/2000\/03\/upn-flattens-a-formulaic-wb-roswell-mentioned\/","title":{"rendered":"UPN Flattens a Formulaic WB &#8211; Roswell Mentioned"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From The Dallas Morning News:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n<strong>UPN flattens a formulaic WB with wrestling<\/strong><br \/>\nThursday, March 2, 2000<\/p>\n<p>By ED BARK<br \/>\nSpecial from The Dallas Morning News<\/p>\n<p>A funny thing happened on the way to the WB&#8217;s coronation as the hottest, coolest, trendiest, most buzz-alicious TV network in the universe.<\/p>\n<p>UPN blew past it.<\/p>\n<p>In what seemed unfathomable just six months ago, the much-derided &#8220;Utterly Pointless Network&#8221; now has more viewers on a weekly basis than WB. You could have gotten better odds last summer on the St. Louis Rams winning the Super Bowl. It&#8217;s been a weird year.<\/p>\n<p>Through the first 21 weeks of the season, UPN&#8217;s prime-time programming is drawing an average of 3.93 million viewers, while WB has slipped to 3.86 million viewers. A year ago, WB had 4.6 million viewers and UPN 2.7 million.<\/p>\n<p>WB also has fallen behind UPN in the battle for advertiser-craved 18- to 49-year-olds. Its audience is still younger than UPN&#8217;s, which WB keeps pointing out. But if its narrow focus persists, WB someday might be touting itself as No. 1 among 12- to 34-year-olds whose first names are either Tawny or Lance.<\/p>\n<p>UPN&#8217;s detractors, of which yours truly is a charter member, will note that it has rebounded on the strength of one gnarly show &#8212; Thursday night&#8217;s two-hour &#8220;WWF Smackdown!&#8221; In the latest ratings week, the Vince McMahon-orchestrated grapple opera drew 8.4 million viewers to rank 77th among 116 prime-time shows.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s hardly a body slam or even a finger poke. But no WB show came close to the &#8220;Smackdown!&#8221; numbers. And UPN&#8217;s men in tights also drew more viewers than series such as CBS&#8217; &#8220;Chicago Hope,&#8221; NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Profiler,&#8221; or Fox&#8217;s &#8220;Beverly Hills 90210.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A few other things are happening, too. WB&#8217;s rigid reliance on teen and twentysomething shows is beginning to resemble an ugly zit outbreak on prom night. Despite massive magazine-cover exposure and overall rapt media attention, series such as &#8220;Dawson&#8217;s Creek,&#8221; &#8220;Felicity,&#8221; and &#8220;Buffy the Vampire Slayer&#8221; are losing viewers. In the Feb. 14-20 Nielsen ratings, all three critics&#8217; darlings were out-drawn by UPN&#8217;s broad sitcom &#8220;The Parkers,&#8221; starring Countess Vaughn and Mo&#8217;Nique.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Felicity&#8221; star Keri Russell&#8217;s heavily publicized hair transformations have done nothing to revive the second-year show, which sank to 100th place and had only 3.7 million viewers. Even UPN&#8217;s Jaleel White sitcom, &#8220;Grown Ups,&#8221; did better. And when&#8217;s the last time you&#8217;ve seen an article about that show?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Dawson&#8217;s Creek,&#8221; in just its second full season, already seems about as &#8220;over&#8221; as Beanie Babies. Once the main topic of conversation in high school hallways, the show lately is generating about as much buzz as Cheryl Ladd&#8217;s next career move. You live by fickle young viewers, you die by fickle young viewers. And a lot of teens lately seem to be treating &#8220;Dawson&#8217;s Creek&#8221; as though it were &#8220;Matlock.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Creek,&#8221; which premiered in January 1998, was principally responsible for driving WB past UPN. Now it&#8217;s symptomatic of what&#8217;s wrong with the network &#8212; too many shows that seem like all of the network&#8217;s other shows. The January premieres of WB&#8217;s latest two coming-of-agers, &#8220;Brutally Normal&#8221; and the reworked &#8220;Zoe&#8221; (formerly &#8220;Zoe, Duncan, Jack and Jane&#8221;), were greeted with &#8212; yawn &#8212; awesome displays of indifference. Three of WB&#8217;s heavily promoted fall newcomers &#8212; &#8220;Roswell,&#8221; &#8220;Popular,&#8221; and &#8220;Jack and Jill&#8221; &#8212; haven&#8217;t made much of an impression either. In the latest ratings, all three drew fewer viewers than UPN&#8217;s &#8220;Malcolm &#038; Eddie.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>UPN and WB, which both had their fifth birthdays in January, will continue to battle back and forth for fifth place among six networks. Wrestling is the difference-maker for UPN, but WB is equally responsible for its current last-place status.<\/p>\n<p>Wrestling&#8217;s impact on UPN is prodigious, but nothing compared to ABC&#8217;s windfall profits from &#8220;Who Wants to Be a Millionaire.&#8221; Consider this: In Week 1 of this season, a &#8220;Millionaire&#8221;-less ABC drew an average of 12.2 million viewers to place third behind NBC (14.5 million) and CBS (14.2 million).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Millionaire&#8217;s&#8221; return, for a 16-night run in November, propelled ABC to an upset win in that month&#8217;s ratings sweeps. Since January, when &#8220;Millionaire&#8221; became a thrice-weekly series, ABC has rocketed to the top of the prime-time ratings. The network now is averaging 13.9 million viewers a week, while NBC and CBS have fallen into a tie for second place with 12.8 million viewers.<\/p>\n<p>One other show has jumped into prominence this season. The success of Fox&#8217;s &#8220;Malcolm in the Middle,&#8221; which premiered in January, isn&#8217;t nearly enough to pull Fox out of fourth place. But it has turned on the lights at an otherwise beleaguered network whose new fall series all collapsed in a heap. Without &#8220;Malcolm,&#8221; Fox would have absolutely nothing to show for Entertainment President Doug Herzog&#8217;s first year in office. Now there&#8217;s renewed hope for the future.<\/p>\n<p>Right now, WB wishes it could say as much.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From The Dallas Morning News: UPN flattens a formulaic WB with wrestling Thursday, March 2, 2000 By ED BARK Special<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[83,84],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-roswell","tag-upn","tag-wb"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}