{"id":966,"date":"2000-07-31T16:03:57","date_gmt":"2000-07-31T14:03:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/?p=966"},"modified":"2008-07-19T16:04:43","modified_gmt":"2008-07-19T14:04:43","slug":"article-quality-vs-ratings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/2000\/07\/article-quality-vs-ratings\/","title":{"rendered":"Article &#8211; Quality vs. Ratings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Thanks to Ang for sending this in!<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When it&#8217;s quality vs. ratings, casualties abound<br \/>\nThursday, August 31, 2000<\/p>\n<p>By BILL KEVENEY<br \/>\nSpecial from The Charlotte Observer<\/p>\n<p>When one TV season ends, networks look ahead to their new fall programs. But many viewers are riled about what the networks try to leave quietly behind: canceled shows.<\/p>\n<p>Before programmers start hyperventilating about the promise of &#8220;Bette&#8221; and &#8220;Dark Angel,&#8221; maybe they should explain what happened to &#8220;Freaks and Geeks,&#8221; &#8220;Now and Again,&#8221; and &#8220;Sports Night.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>When some viewers were asked what they would ask network executives during the recent summer TV critics&#8217; press tour in California, most questions were about the fate of favorite shows. Why did CBS cancel &#8220;Early Edition?&#8221; asked one respondent. Simple answer: ratings.<\/p>\n<p>For all shows, the final judgment is the Nielsen ratings, which measure how many people are watching and determine how much can be charged for commercials.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s easy to understand the bombs, such as CBS&#8217; &#8220;Work With Me.&#8221; The sad fate that befalls better shows isn&#8217;t as clear-cut. Their ratings sag for a variety of reasons, including poor scheduling, lack of promotion, and ineffective marketing. Small, ardent fan bases usually can&#8217;t save them.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You try to listen to what people are saying. You try to stay with shows that have a passionate following,&#8221; said Sandy Grushow, chairman of the Fox Television Entertainment Group. &#8220;But in the final analysis, sadly and frustratingly, it&#8217;s a business. The bottom line, oftentimes, wins out.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Fans shouldn&#8217;t give up fighting for their shows, however. The WB renewed &#8220;Roswell&#8221; after fans deluged the network with 6,000 bottles of Tabasco sauce &#8212; the condiment of choice on the teen alien drama. Their zeal helped save it.<\/p>\n<p>To get an idea of why some good shows fail, let&#8217;s do an autopsy on recent prime-time corpses. Here are factors that contributed to their deaths:<\/p>\n<p>Bad time slot.<\/p>\n<p>NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Freaks and Geeks,&#8221; a wonderful high school coming-of-age story, was cursed with a horrible time slot, 8 p.m. on Saturday, the lowest-rated viewing night.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, the program often wasn&#8217;t on. NBC pulled &#8220;Freaks and Geeks&#8221; for baseball playoffs, for &#8220;sweeps&#8221; months (because of low ratings), and for the game show &#8220;Twenty-One.&#8221; It got a second chance on Mondays, but ratings didn&#8217;t grow.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I know a lot of people didn&#8217;t get to see it because of the erratic scheduling. I mean, we were always hearing people saying, &#8216;Oh, we turned on your show and it wasn&#8217;t on and &#8216;Twenty-One&#8217; was on,'&#8221; show creator Paul Feig said.<\/p>\n<p>In other cases, the lower expectations of a weak time slot can help. CBS&#8217; &#8220;Touched By an Angel,&#8221; written off at the start by many in the business, had time to grow into a hit at 8 p.m. Saturdays, before moving to Sundays. CBS hoped its successor, &#8220;Early Edition,&#8221; would become another family-oriented Saturday success, network president Leslie Moonves said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It was given four years to run. It did OK. Then the ratings started to slip. We felt we could do better than that,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Good time slot.<\/p>\n<p>For years, TV&#8217;s most protected time slot was 9:30 p.m. Thursdays on NBC, where a fledgling show was &#8220;hammocked&#8221; between two hits, &#8220;Seinfeld&#8221; (later &#8220;Frasier&#8221;) and &#8220;ER.&#8221; Shows such as &#8220;Veronica&#8217;s Closet&#8221; had strong ratings in that spot, earning renewal, but audiences dropped substantially when they moved to other time periods.<\/p>\n<p>After seeing that happen repeatedly, NBC began demanding better results from the show in that time slot. So, last year&#8217;s 9:30 occupant, &#8220;Stark Raving Mad,&#8221; was canceled, even though it had more viewers than many other shows.<\/p>\n<p>One of TV&#8217;s best (and more unusual) comedies, ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Sports Night,&#8221; suffered a similar fate. In its 9:30 Tuesday time slot, &#8220;Sports Night&#8221; had OK ratings, but couldn&#8217;t hold on to enough of the audience passed on by &#8220;Dharma &#038; Greg&#8221; and didn&#8217;t deliver enough viewers to the 10 p.m. shows, &#8220;Once and Again&#8221; and &#8220;NYPD Blue,&#8221; ABC executives said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We loved that series,&#8221; said Stu Bloomberg, co-chairman of ABC Entertainment Television. In TV, however, love often means having to say you&#8217;re sorry.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Sports Night&#8221; didn&#8217;t fit with ABC&#8217;s other shows, program creator Aaron Sorkin said. He said &#8220;Sports Night&#8221; and its 9 p.m. lead-in, &#8220;Dharma &#038; Greg,&#8221; attracted different kinds of viewers, so that it&#8217;s no wonder that &#8220;Sports Night&#8221; didn&#8217;t hold on to &#8220;Dharma &#038; Greg&#8217;s&#8221; audience.<\/p>\n<p>Poor marketing.<\/p>\n<p>Remember Fox&#8217;s &#8220;Get Real&#8221;? Probably not, and that&#8217;s the problem, Grushow said. The edgy family drama was launched before most other fall premieres, was preempted for baseball playoffs, and never got the audience &#8220;traction&#8221; it needed, he said.<\/p>\n<p>Money, money, money.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;La Femme Nikita&#8221; had decent ratings for four years on USA Network, but fell victim to a dispute over the cost of a renewal deal.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The freeze on &#8216;La Femme Nikita&#8217; was purely a political thing between the network and the studio,&#8221; star Peta Wilson said.<\/p>\n<p>Money also played a role in the demise of CBS&#8217; critically praised &#8220;Now and Again,&#8221; whose so-so ratings couldn&#8217;t justify the expensive $2.4 million cost per episode.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It would have been idiotic to pick up that show&#8221; when an episode&#8217;s expenses exceeded revenues by more than $1 million, Moonves said.<\/p>\n<p>There is good news, however. Shows can get a second chance. Here are some reasons why:<\/p>\n<p>Small safety &#8220;nets.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Programs on the mini-networks, the WB and UPN, can survive with lower ratings. Since those networks target youthful niches rather than a broad audience, they can experiment with sluggish but promising shows. The extra time helps some shows find an audience.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;7th Heaven&#8217; was the lowest-rated show on network television. Now it&#8217;s our highest-rated show,&#8221; said Jordan Levin, The WB&#8217;s executive vice president of programming.<\/p>\n<p>The mini-networks can be a haven. ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Sabrina, the Teenage Witch&#8221; is moving to the WB, and ABC&#8217;s &#8220;The Hughleys&#8221; is going to UPN. They were victims of ABC&#8217;s decision to end its family-friendly &#8220;TGIF&#8221; Friday lineup, but they could fit in on the youth-oriented networks.<\/p>\n<p>Ya gotta have friends.<\/p>\n<p>Fans helped save &#8220;Roswell&#8221;. &#8220;I had to change my e-mail address at work three times because it just kept getting full of thousands of e-mails,&#8221; WB Entertainment President Susanne Daniels said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thanks to Ang for sending this in! When it&#8217;s quality vs. ratings, casualties abound Thursday, August 31, 2000 By BILL<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[40],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-roswell","tag-article"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=966"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/966\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=966"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crashdown.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}